Peer Review Policy
All manuscripts submitted to the International Journal of Mathematics Teaching and Interdisciplinary Practices (IJMTIP) are subject to a rigorous double-blind peer review process.
-
Double-blind review means that both reviewers and authors remain anonymous throughout the review process.
-
Submissions are first assessed by the editorial team to ensure compliance with the journal's scope, formatting, and ethical standards.
-
Manuscripts deemed appropriate are assigned to at least two independent expert reviewers.
-
Reviewers evaluate the manuscript based on its originality, theoretical contribution, methodological rigor, clarity, relevance, and alignment with the journal's aims.
-
The editorial decision (accept, minor revision, major revision, or reject) is based on reviewers’ reports and the editor’s judgment.
-
Authors are expected to respond to reviewers' comments in a respectful and constructive manner.
-
Revised submissions may be re-reviewed by the same or new reviewers.
IJMTIP is committed to fair, timely, and unbiased peer review. The journal follows COPE guidelines for ethical peer review practices.